FDA outlines what it will take to get a COVID-19 vaccine approved, while NIH offers its research strategy.
As the race heats up to create vaccines to halt the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), two key federal agencies signaled this week that getting it right outweighs the need for speed.
First, on June 30, 2020, FDA issued released a guidance for industry outlining what data the agency will want to see before any vaccine is approved. The next day, leaders from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) vaccine working group, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, concluded that “large, randomized controlled trials” of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease, offer the fastest, safest way to a vaccine that will have widespread use.
In their message, the NIH authors said a research path that relies on purposely infecting healthy volunteers with the virus—known as controlled human infection models, or CHIMs—would still take one to two years, giving the protocols needed to reduce risk. However, the authors said this route may, at some point, have a limited role to “complement” large trials; the authors said this might help answer questions about seasonal coronaviruses, or to understand how long immunity lasts.
The trouble with using CHIMs at this point, they write, is that SARS-CoV-2 is too dangerous and too little is known about it. “Virtually all recent CHIMs have involved microorganisms that either pose minimal risk for causing severe disease in the enrolled population, have effective oral treatments, or both,” they wrote.
“Currently, we lack sufficient knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis to inform inclusion and exclusion criteria for a SARS-CoV-2 CHIM. A single death or severe illness in an otherwise healthy volunteer would be unconscionable and would halt progress.”
The quest for a COVID-19 vaccine has drawn entrants from across the pharmaceutical industry, including giants such as Pfizer and AstraZeneca and biotechs that include Moderna and Inovio, which released a progress report this week with few details. Several phase 3 trials are set to start this month, with developers taking a range of approaches, including DNA, RNA, protein and viral vectored vaccines.
In a statement on the guidance, FDA Commissioner Stephen M. Hahn, M.D., said the approval process must have the public’s trust. "While the FDA is committed to expediting this work, we will not cut corners in our decisions and are making clear through this guidance what data should be submitted to meet our regulatory standards. This is particularly important, as we know that some people are skeptical of vaccine development efforts," Hahn said.
"We have not lost sight of our responsibility to the American people to maintain our regulatory independence and ensure our decisions related to all medical products, including COVID-19 vaccines, are based on science and the available data. This is a commitment that the American public can have confidence in and one that I will continue to uphold."
FDA’s message offered the following to developers of any SARS-CoV-2 vaccine:
As with all vaccines, FDA will require extensive monitoring once the product is available, and post-marketing studies may be required.
.
David Calabrese of OptumRx Talks New Role, Market Insulin Prices and Other Topics 'On His Mind'
April 13th 2023In this month’s episode of the "What's On Your Mind podcast," Peter Wehrwein, managing editor of MHE connects with the now Chief Clinical Officer of OptumRx Integrated Pharmacies, David Calabrese. In this conversation, David touches on his transition in January as OptumRx’s former chief pharmacy officer and market president of health plans and PBMs to his new role as Chief Clinical Officer where he now focuses more on things such as specialty pharmacy to home delivery — with an overall goal of creating whole-patient care. Throughout the conversation, Calabrese also touched on the market’s hot topic of insulin prices and behavioral health services within the OptumRx community, among other topics.
Listen
In this episode of the "Meet the Board" podcast series, Briana Contreras, Managed Healthcare Executive editor, speaks with Ateev Mehrotra, a member of the MHE editorial advisory board and a professor of healthcare policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School. Mehtrotra is also a hospitalist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. In the discussion, Contreras gets to know Mehrotra more on a personal level and picks his brain on some of his research interests including telehealth, alternative payment models and price transparency.
Listen