A survey from telemedicine provider Carena has interesting findings about virtual clinics.
Patients are looking for their best option for care and they are searching for it online, according to a new survey.
Telemedicine provider Carena, which partners with hospitals and health systems, collected data from nearly 30 health system partners in nearly 20 states between January 1 and December 31, 2016. To ensure patient satisfaction, Carena surveyed all of its virtual clinic patients after every visit. The survey looked at overall patient satisfaction, discovery of the virtual clinic (how the patient learned about the virtual clinic), and use case of the virtual clinic (were the patients’ needs met and where would they have gone for care otherwise) to determine how virtual clinics can better meet the needs of patients and health system partners. Approximately 10% of patient surveyed provide a response.
Among many findings, the analysis showed that 44% survey respondents did not have a primary care provider at the time of service and 66% of respondents said they would have gone to an urgent care facility or emergency room if not for the virtual clinic service.
Derrickson“Retail clinics and direct-to-consumer telemedicine options are competing with health systems online and building relationships with consumers creating fragmentation,” says Carena CEO Ralph C. Derrickson.
“Health systems have an opportunity to capture market share, mitigate costs, and offset bad debts from high urgent care and ED utilization,” says Derrickson. “The virtual clinic provides a digital front door to the health system guiding patients to the most appropriate place for care at the time of need.”
The analysis from patient surveys showed 3 key findings:
“Healthcare executives need to reevaluate how they connect with patients and consumers,” says Derrickson. “A virtual clinic can create a digital front door for consumers searching online for affordable care options.”
As providers begin to take on more risk, the ability to scale services and sustain patient relationships is essential to avoid leakage and better manage diverse patient populations, according to Derrickson.
“Digital engagement provides health systems an opportunity to meet the needs required under a value-based environment and connect with patients on their terms,” he says.
In this episode of the "Meet the Board" podcast series, Briana Contreras, Managed Healthcare Executive editor, speaks with Ateev Mehrotra, a member of the MHE editorial advisory board and a professor of healthcare policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School. Mehtrotra is also a hospitalist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. In the discussion, Contreras gets to know Mehrotra more on a personal level and picks his brain on some of his research interests including telehealth, alternative payment models and price transparency.
Listen
Doing More and Saving More with Primary in Home Care
September 1st 2021In this week’s episode of Tuning In to the C-Suite podcast, MHE Associate Editor Briana Contreras interviewed VillageMD’s Senior Medical Director of Village Medical at Home, Dr. Tom Cornwell. Dr. Cornwell discussed the main benefits of primary care at home, which includes the benefit of cost savings for patients, maintaining control of hospital readmissions and others. Dr. Cornwell also noted what has changed in the industry of at-home care and if there has been interest from payers like insurance companies and medicare in the service.
Listen