Novo Nordisk said it’s open to discussions with PBMs based on their commitments that a lower semgalutide list price would not impact formulary coverage.
This story first appeared on Drug Topics.
Novo Nordisk President and CEO Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen stepped into the hot seat during a September 24 hearing of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Over nearly two and a half hours, the committee, chaired by Senator Bernie Sanders (I, Vt.), questioned Jørgensen on topics ranging from the impact of high drug prices to the role of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in the pricing of Novo Nordisk’s blockbuster glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist semgalutide (Ozempic, Wegovy).
During his opening statement, Sanders acknowledged that by pricing semaglutide at $969 and $1,349 for Ozempic and Wegovy, respectively, Novo Nordisk is neither acting illegally or in violation of any laws.
“What they are doing is perfectly lawful,” he said. “They are simply taking advantage of the fact that, until very recently, the United States has been the only major country not to negotiate the cost of prescription drugs.”1
Put another way, Sanders continued, “Novo Nordisk and other drug companies can charge us exactly as much as the market will bear — and that is exactly what they are doing.”
There are no doubts that the U.S. healthcare system is opaque and complex, and — as many committee members acknowledged — pharmaceutical manufacturers are not the only piece in the drug pricing puzzle. But, Sanders said, “Prescription drugs in this country must be affordable, and we must not be forced to pay far higher prices than people in other countries pay for the exact same product.”
Read on for the top five takeaways from the testimony.
The price disparities between the United States and other countries for both Ozempic and Wegovy are stark. With a price of $969, Ozempic costs more than nine times in the US what it does in Germany, where it retails for $59. Wegovy, priced at $1,349, is more than 4.5 times more expensive in the United States than it is in Denmark, where it is available for just $186.
Concerns about the impact of high drug prices in the United States aren’t just economic, they’re moral as well. The high prices of life-saving medications, especially those for chronic conditions, are leading to preventable deaths and creating a significant financial burden on the U.S. healthcare system. Sanders cited two studies from Yale University researchers. In the first study, epidemiologist Alison Galvani, Ph.D., found that more than 40,000 lives per year could be saved if Wegovy was available at an affordable price.2 In the second, Melissa Barber, a healthcare economist at Yale University found that Ozempic can be manufactured profitably for less than $5 a month.3
Jørgensen and Novo Nordisk are willing to collaborate with the Committee and PBMs to find pricing solutions. When pressed by several committee members, including Sanders and Maggie Hassan (D., N.H.), Jørgensen agreed that he would be open to discussions with PBMs based on their commitments that a lower semgalutide list price would not impact formulary coverage.
Scrutiny into PBM practices must continue. Across the bipartisan committee, all senators agreed that PBM practices play a significant role in the drug pricing problem. In addition to Sanders, Senators Tim Kaine (D., Va.), Mike Braun (R., Ind.), and Roger Marshall, M.D., (R., Kan.) heavily criticized PBMs, with Marshall emphasizing that “Novo Nordisk is not the villain in this story; they’re a hero. We should be here celebrating this miracle innovation.”
Drug pricing must be addressed, but solutions need to balance affordability with research and development (R&D) incentives. Senators Marshall, Mitt Romney (R., Utah), and Ranking Member Bill Cassidy, M.D., (R., La.) all raised concerns that if profit incentives weren’t preserved, pharmaceutical companies would lose their incentives to develop new treatments. But as pricing currently stands, the United States bears a disproportionate burden when it comes to paying for R&D that benefits individuals on a global level.
References
ICER Finds Insurers Struggled to Provide Fair Access for Obesity Drugs
December 19th 2024The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review assessed the formularies of 11 payers, covering 57 million people, to determine access for drugs that the organization had reviewed in 2022 for cost-effectiveness.
Read More