Study quantifies payment variation in private health plan markets
There's a large gap in private insurer inpatient payment rates among regions, with Miami-South Florida averaging 147% of Medicare rates, while San Francisco came in at 210%
NATIONAL REPORTS-A recent study of select geographic provider markets found a large gap in private insurer inpatient payment rates among regions, with Miami-South Florida averaging a reimbursement rate of 147% of Medicare rates, while San Francisco came in at 210% of Medicare reimbursement rates on average.
The study by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) highlights the disparity in payments insurers made to hospitals and physician groups across the United States and was commissioned by Catalyst for Payment Reform (CPR), an employer group based in San Francisco.
"There are a few factors that directly affect the results," says Paul Ginsburg, HSC's president, and the author of the study. "Market concentration is a likely factor, along with the presence of an outstanding or 'flagship' hospital that everyone wants in their network."
Outpatient prices fared no better than inpatient rates, with the range starting at 234% of Medicare rates in Cleveland to 366% in San Francisco. Physician payment rates varied as well, ranging from 82% in Miami-South Florida, to 176% in rural Wisconsin.
Ginsberg says the decrease in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates in recent years is resulting in hospitals cost shifting to private insurers to compensate for the lost revenue.
Suzanne Delbanco, executive director of CPR, says she found the results of the study more confirming than surprising. Most thought leaders instinctively know such variation exists-and the Dartmouth Atlas has long chronicled the variation in Medicare spending-this study aims to quantify some of the variation for the private market.
"The study found what many suspected: there is variation in private insurer payment rates to hospitals across and within local markets," according to Delbanco.
Medicare’s Drug Negotiation Could Lead to Greater Access — or More Utilization Management
October 3rd 2023Even though the Inflation Reduction Act will require plans to justify formulary placement of negotiated drugs, payers have more of an incentive to steer patients to lower-cost alternatives.
Read More
It’s Time to Tame the “Diagnostic-Coding Arms Race”: NEJM Opinion Piece
July 29th 2022The trend of primary care practices and businesses bearing risk has pitfalls. A trio of experts have suggestions for how they can be avoided, including taking steps to de-emphasizing diagnostic coding in the calculations that determine payment.
Read More
Another Legal Challenge to the ACA
July 26th 2022The plaintiffs in Kelley v. Becerra are arguing that the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that preventive services be covered without cost sharing is unconstitutional. In a factsheet published yesterday, the Urban Institute says that the ACA requirement has had an especially a large effect on women, partly because contraception is among the services covered by the no-cost-sharing rules that apply to private insurers.
Read More
Medicaid managed care organization (MCOs) may be better equipped to address social determinants of health (SDOH) and health equity than payers who use fee-for-service models because SDOH are central to many requirements for MCOs, including those pertaining to population health management, health equity and care coordination.
Read More
