A new study has shocking results about which commercially available apps improve diabetes-related outcomes.
While hundreds of apps for diabetes self-management are commercially available, diabetes patients lack information on which apps improve diabetes-related outcomes, according to a study.
The study, published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, conducted a rapid evidence review to examine features, clinical efficacy, and usability of apps for self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults.
Fifteen articles evaluating 11 apps were identified: six apps for type 1 and five apps for type 2 diabetes. Of these 11 apps, only five were associated with clinically significant improvements in HbA1c, an important clinical test for monitoring diabetes.
Lead study author Stephanie Veazie, MPH, Research Associate, Scientific Resource Center, Portland VA Research Foundation, and colleagues searched both recently published studies and systematic reviews for data on commercially available apps. They evaluated these primary studies for risk of bias (i.e., quality) to determine if the results could be trusted. The researchers then looked for the apps online and evaluated their features, privacy policies, and usability. They then organized the information by app to help inform patient, provider, and health system decisions on whether to use a diabetes app, and which app to use. The report was reviewed by experts in both diabetes and mobile health.
The study found:
“None of the studies showed patient improvements in quality of life, blood pressure, weight, or body mass index,” says Veazie. “The studies had methodological limitations. More rigorous and longer-term research studies could determine whether apps help people manage their diabetes and reduce complications.”
Patients within health systems should be aware that most commercially apps for diabetes self-management are not supported by evidence, according to Veazie. “Most of the studies were short-term and it’s unclear if app use can lead to sustained improvements. In the studies we found, apps were combined with support from a provider or study staff member. Therefore, it is not clear whether the app or the additional interaction with a provider or study staff led to the improvements.”
Based on the study, here are three things Veazie wants healthcare executives to know about mHealth for diabetes care management:
The study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Doing More and Saving More with Primary in Home Care
September 1st 2021In this week’s episode of Tuning In to the C-Suite podcast, MHE Associate Editor Briana Contreras interviewed VillageMD’s Senior Medical Director of Village Medical at Home, Dr. Tom Cornwell. Dr. Cornwell discussed the main benefits of primary care at home, which includes the benefit of cost savings for patients, maintaining control of hospital readmissions and others. Dr. Cornwell also noted what has changed in the industry of at-home care and if there has been interest from payers like insurance companies and medicare in the service.
Listen
This week on Tuning Into The C-Suite Briana Contreras spoke with Dr. Scott Hayworth, president and CEO of New York-based CareMount Medical. In this interview, the two discussed the importance of patients staying in contact with their doctors for the sake of reducing public health risks and to discuss ongoing care options with them.
Listen