A demonstration project showed that frequent testing reduced the median time to diagnosis by nearly 14 months.
Early diagnosis of HIV is critical for both the patient and the public. It allows people who are infected to begin antiretroviral treatment, and the resulting suppression of viral load preserves the individual’s immune function while also preventing transmission to others.
Frequent testing is the key to early diagnosis for people in populations at higher risk for being infected with HIV.
The power of frequent screening for HIV was driven home by a study finding that infected members of at-risk groups received a much earlier diagnosis if they were tested at least twice a year. Their median time to diagnosis was nearly 14 months shorter than for those who were tested less often.
The study, published July 6 in the American Journal of Public Health, followed clients in the Targeted Highly Effective Interventions to Reverse the HIV Epidemic (THRIVE) demonstration project between 2015 and 2020.
For THRIVE, the CDC funded seven big-city health departments to develop and lead community collaboratives aimed at providing comprehensive, culturally sensitive HIV prevention and care services for people at high risk of infection: cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women in communities with high numbers of infected Black or Hispanic MSM. The health departments collected longitudinal client data, including HIV testing dates and results.
Nearly 30,000 clients had an initial negative HIV test. Of those, 5,710 adults received one or more additional tests of any kind and were not on THRIVE-provided preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which involves taking antiviral medication on a preventive basis and lowers the risk of infection (and raises the recommended frequency of HIV testing).
More than two-fifths were tested frequently (an average interval of 180 days or less between tests), with slightly higher rates among people aged 18 to 34 and slightly lower for older groups. Compared with white clients, Black clients were 21% and Hispanic clients 18% less likely to receive frequent testing.
Compared with cisgender heterosexual men, MSM were 25% more likely to get tested frequently, transgender women 24% more likely and cisgender women 15% more likely.
Black and Hispanic MSM and transgender women had the highest HIV incidence rates, mirroring the epidemiology of HIV in the United States.
Anne A. Kimball, M.D., M.P.H., of the CDC was the first author of a study of more frequent HIV testing published earlier this month in the American Journal of Public Health.
The researchers found that HIV-positive clients who were tested at least once every six months were diagnosed more quickly — an average 137 days compared with 559 days for those who went longer between tests, wrote first author Anne A. Kimball, M.D., MPH, a public health physician at the CDC and colleagues in the agency’s Division of HIV Prevention and at the health departments that participated in THRIVE.
If early diagnosis is soon followed by treatment, the shorter duration leads to faster viral suppression, reduced HIV-related morbidity and mortality and prevention of community transmission. In addition, every test offers an opportunity for public health workers to discuss other prevention strategies, such as PrEP.
The study also found that more frequent testing was more efficient, with a diagnostic yield — the number of positive patients detected divided by the total cohort size — of 1.5% compared with 0.8% for those tested less often.
Overall, the research article strongly supported more frequent testing in the THRIVE demonstration project. But the Kimball and colleagues pointed out that existing barriers to HIV prevention services were beyond this project’s scope.
“Although interventions were implemented in THRIVE jurisdictions to increase community collaboration and to provide culturally sensitive and community-tailored HIV prevention services,” they concluded, “we observed disparities in the frequency of HIV testing. Additional long-term, multifaceted programs may be needed to increase HIV testing among persons in priority populations and to overcome the social and structural barriers that drive disparities in HIV incidence.”
Sexual Health and HIV Care Integration Key to Better Care | IAS 2025
July 14th 2025Integrating HIV and sexual health care is essential for improving outcomes, but global stigma, funding cuts—especially the defunding of USAID—and structural barriers like limited access and political resistance continue to hinder progress, experts emphasized at IAS 2025.
Read More
Lenacapavir HIV PrEP: Not an AIDS Vaccine, but Vaccine Adjacent
June 19th 2025Experts and advocates say that twice-a-year HIV PrEP injections have the prevention potential of a vaccine — and that a once-a-year version of lenacapavir would be even better. But will Yeztugo be available to the people who would benefit most from HIV PrEP?
Read More
Trump Budget Axes CDC HIV Prevention, Shifts Care, Experts Warn of Risks
June 10th 2025Although some HIV programs will remain, the proposed cuts in the fiscal year 2026 budget are too severe and will hinder HIV care and research in the United States, according to Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute in Washington, D.C.
Read More