It is important to consider the impact the federally mandated coverage provisions might have on enrollment.
MEDICARE DOMINANT PAYER
In short, MedPAC asserts that it is not necessarily that Medicare "underpays," but rather that market power in some areas allows providers to operate inefficiently and make up the costs through negotiating higher payment rates with private payers. Of course, many providers and private payers dispute this conclusion.
Meanwhile, a massive Medicaid expansion is on the horizon. In fact, a recent study by analysts at the Harvard School of Public Health found that as many as 22.4 million people could be added to the Medicaid rolls by 2019.
This growth means that Medicaid and CHIP will become far larger payers than Medicare. Indeed, the CMS Actuary estimates that 82.2 million people will be covered by Medicaid and CHIP in 2019, and only 60.5 million in Medicare. The result of this expansion, along with the corresponding start-up of health insurance exchanges providing federal subsidies for the purchase of insurance, is that although almost 93% of the population will be insured by 2019, government will be paying for the insurance for half of this population-with Medicaid as the dominant payer, rather than Medicare.
As a result, Medicaid patients-and their accompanying reimbursement rates-are likely to impact more and more providers over time and potentially shift a greater portion of the healthcare system's costs onto the privately financed insurance market.
COST SHIFT DEBATED
While the exact effect of public payer payment rates on private healthcare costs can be debated, the fact that impending federal and state budget calamities will put increasing strain on rates in both Medicare and Medicaid cannot.
While some providers may answer the call by becoming more efficient and embracing new payment models (as MedPAC suggests is possible), change will not come over night. Therefore, the privately insured-and the employers that pay the bill for the majority of their healthcare costs-should explore ways to rationalize payment rates across both public and private payers, and lead the push for delivery system transformations that will reduce healthcare costs systemwide.
Cindy Gillespie is a managing director for McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP.
Elizabeth Carpenter is a healthcare specialist for McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP.
Breaking Down Health Plans, HSAs, AI With Paul Fronstin of EBRI
November 19th 2024Featured in this latest episode of Tuning In to the C-Suite podcast is Paul Fronstin, director of health benefits research at EBRI, who shed light on the evolving landscape of health benefits with editors of Managed Healthcare Executive.
Listen
New PTSD Treatment Shows Promise with Brexpiprazole, Sertraline Combination
December 24th 2024Currently, the only medications approved by the FDA for PTSD are the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) sertraline and paroxetine. However, these medications don’t work for everyone.
Read More
In this latest episode of Tuning In to the C-Suite podcast, Briana Contreras, an editor with MHE had the pleasure of meeting Loren McCaghy, director of consulting, health and consumer engagement and product insight at Accenture, to discuss the organization's latest report on U.S. consumers switching healthcare providers and insurance payers.
Listen
How the Contact Center Can Be a Driver of VBC Success
December 23rd 2024Historically, healthcare organizations have considered the contact center to be a cost center, a communications platform for conveying information to patients and plan members. Today, however, AI-enabled contact centers can be drivers of value, especially in a value-based care environment.
Read More