Breast cancer treatment settings prove to be a good opportunity to talk about financial toxicity. These conversations can also happen in generalized healthcare, according to Laila Gharzai, M.D., LLM, from the Department of Radiation Oncology at Northwestern University.
Laila Gharzai, M.D., LLM, from the Department of Radiation Oncology at Northwestern University says conversations about financial toxicity are easier to have with breast cancer patients because of their large population size and the fact that many of them are receive treatment for a long time, leading to higher costs and more recovery time.
Gharzai said this can be applied to all healthcare if the right steps are taken.
“I think one of our first steps of the community is going to be figuring out what is the right question to ask,” Gharzai said in an interview with Managed Healthcare Executive. “We need to look at identifying how exactly we want to screen and then figure out how often we actually want to be doing this as a screening question, versus having a person going in and touching base with patients as well.”
Gharzai and her colleagues recently published the results of their study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The research team sent an anonymous survey to email subscribers of a nationwide breast cancer–specific philanthropic organization The Pink Fund, asking about financial toxicity screening preferences. Results revealed that patients preferred financial screening conversations be initiated by their providers (83%), happen early (at diagnosis, 45%; when treatment is selected, 37%) and once a month (36%).
Breast Cancer Patients Desire Early, Frequent Financial Screening
November 11th 2024Current financial screening procedures in the United States may need to change, according to recent research done by Laila Gharzai, M.D., LLM, from the Department of Radiation Oncology at Northwestern University.
Read More
Patient Advocacy Groups and Caretaker Diversity in Metastatic Breast Cancer Research
October 22nd 2024Stephanie Graff, M.D., FACP, FASCO, director of breast oncology at the Lifespan Cancer Institute and author of Investigating the Salience of Clinical Meaningfulness and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care Delivery, shares the reasons why she chose to study metastatic breast cancer patients.
Read More
Differences in Defining 'Clinically Meaningful' in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care
October 4th 2024Stephanie Graff, M.D., FACP, FASCO, director of breast oncology at the Lifespan Cancer Institute, explains the importance of the term “clinically meaningful” and shares some of the ways it can be defined.
Read More