Bills take aim at deceptive practices
Policy makers focus on consumer protection and health plan conduct
NATIONAL REPORTS - Washington policy makers and consumer advocates are throwing the book at health insurers for deceptive practices in setting rates and coverage policies. There's legislation moving through Congress to require disclosure of little-known coverage exclusions; investigations continue into methods for calculating out-of-network costs; and proposals are circulating to prevent insurers from rejecting applications due to pre-existing conditions.
The Senate Commerce Committee is focusing more on consumer protection related to health insurance under its new chairman, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va.).
Rockefeller is sponsoring legislation that would prevent insurers from denying coverage to individuals based on pre-existing conditions. The bill also bans higher premiums for patients with certain diseases, as well as surcharges for higher-cost care.
Separately, the House recently approved legislation requiring insurers to fully disclose all limits on benefit exclusions.
At a Commerce Committee hearing in March, UnitedHealth Group President Steve Hemsley and Ingenix CEO Andy Slavitt were on the hot seat as Rockefeller and his colleagues pressed for an explanation of out-of-network rate-setting practices. He wants to know how the emerging new system will operate and if all major insurers are supporting it.
Doug Chaet of Value Evolutions Discusses Value-based Payment Models, Where They Stand and More
September 29th 2022In this episode of Tuning In to the C-Suite, Managing Editor of Managed Healthcare Executive, Peter Wehrwein, speaks with President of Value Evolutions and MHE Editorial Advisory Board Member, Doug Chaet, FACHE, about value-based care's current standing, the status of select payment models like bundled and episodic, and more.
Listen
We conducted our annual State of the Industry survey in the early part of November 2023. The survey had 432 respondents, of whom 56% self-reported working for a payer organization (pharmacy benefit manager, insurer or self-insured employer), 34% for a provider organization and the remainder for government or an unspecified “other” category.
Read More
Parity for Mental Health — Any Progress?
October 12th 2023Laws since 1996 have sought to assure that coverage of behavioral health treatments does not take a back seat to physical medicine. Amid a national crisis in mental illness and addiction, that new world of equality has not arrived. But is it on the way?
Read More
