In the shift from quantity to quality, there are five critical areas where quality is critical.
The transition to value-based care models from the traditional fee-for-service systems that prioritize quantity over quality has placed new emphasis on what constitutes “quality” in healthcare. Since value-based care reimbursement strategies center around the quality of services delivered, it is critical to identify what exactly that term means-and how it is measured-lest it adversely affect healthcare providers’ revenue streams.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality denotes six domains of healthcare quality, including effective, efficient, timely, safe, patient-centered, and equitable. These measures can be combined and leveraged differently in varying value-based care deals, but are all critical areas for value-based care success, as many contracts require that certain quality measures must be met before payment.
1. Effectiveness and efficiency
Effective and efficient care are a joint effort that centers around ensuring that hospital patients receive proper care and the resources to coordinate future care to reduce readmission rates.
Since it is difficult to measure effectiveness or efficiency directly (as outside factors can affect readmissions or patient health despite a practitioner’s thorough care) many value-based care arrangements instead assess whether or not the provider has taken the appropriate steps to deliver a level of care that could have prevented readmission barring extenuating circumstances. This helps to reinforce a high standard of comprehensive care.
2. Timeliness
Providing prompt patient care can positively affect patient experience and increase quality of care. Difficulty making appointments, or long wait times to get in for an appointment, can negatively affect patient experience and hinder patient care. Delays in care create challenges in fulfilling the tenants of value-based care models, and can hinger the preventative aspects of the model.
3. Safety
Quality care means safe care. Patient safety models are incorporated into value-based care models for obvious reasons, since a major emphasis in these systems is on prevention.
For example, this means that things like preventing secondary infections that could result in preventable hospitalizations can be a key quality measure. This is both an effective cost-saving strategy, as well as a benefit to the patient. An emphasis on providing safe care that prevents extraneous complications is a positive result for both payer and patient.
Related: Three Reasons Why Value-based Care Works
4. Patient focus
Patients want to feel like they are being listened to and that their providers care about their health and well-being. Patient-centered care checks off these boxes to provide a more fulfilling patient experience. This can also come as a result of increased patient compliance and more effective coordination of care, which is rewarded by value-based care models.
5. Equitability
A tricky quality measure to evaluate quantitatively, equitability is nonetheless critical in value-based care models. Equity quality measures encourage providers to provide care to patients from every portion of the population, regardless of demographic.
Many value-based care arrangements put an emphasis on-and reward practitioners for completing-preventative screenings. However, reimbursement is often contingent on screening rates being comparable across these different demographics, which encourages equitable care across all populations.
An important consideration in healthcare equity includes understanding and addressing social determinants of health, such as the economic status of patients. To date, most healthcare equity efforts have centered on community health programs-programs that don’t always meet the standards of care in a value-based payment model.
While value-based care models differ in their emphasis on different quality measures-often due to the needs of the target population-all of them play an important role in every model since they are so interconnected. Only by providing quality care will value-based care models be successful.
Laura Dorr is a freelance writer based outside of Cleveland. She has served as a writer and editor for a variety of publications and websites across the medical, dental, sports, education, and nonprofit industries.
Medicare’s Drug Negotiation Could Lead to Greater Access — or More Utilization Management
October 3rd 2023Even though the Inflation Reduction Act will require plans to justify formulary placement of negotiated drugs, payers have more of an incentive to steer patients to lower-cost alternatives.
Read More
It’s Time to Tame the “Diagnostic-Coding Arms Race”: NEJM Opinion Piece
July 29th 2022The trend of primary care practices and businesses bearing risk has pitfalls. A trio of experts have suggestions for how they can be avoided, including taking steps to de-emphasizing diagnostic coding in the calculations that determine payment.
Read More
Another Legal Challenge to the ACA
July 26th 2022The plaintiffs in Kelley v. Becerra are arguing that the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that preventive services be covered without cost sharing is unconstitutional. In a factsheet published yesterday, the Urban Institute says that the ACA requirement has had an especially a large effect on women, partly because contraception is among the services covered by the no-cost-sharing rules that apply to private insurers.
Read More
Medicaid managed care organization (MCOs) may be better equipped to address social determinants of health (SDOH) and health equity than payers who use fee-for-service models because SDOH are central to many requirements for MCOs, including those pertaining to population health management, health equity and care coordination.
Read More